Subject: Re: race in sleep.
To: J.T. Conklin <>
From: Paul Kranenburg <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 10/18/1995 22:23:42
> > Well, maybe longer term we could provide some of the system calls
> > that would be needed if we did realtime signals, in this case:
> Yes!  I'm in favour of this.  Realtime stuff could greatly expand the
> realm of applications/installation where NetBSD would be appropriate, 
> especially embedded sytems and industrial control.  ie. Why licence
> VxWorks, LynxOS, etc. if NetBSD can do the job?

Ok then.. let's explore the possibility of forming a little project
to look into the issues involved in real-time extensions.

Pointers to docs/standards, anyone?