Subject: Re: rminit()/rmfree() etc.
To: None <, tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 09/15/1995 21:08:44
> what's the rationale behind rminit() making 0 an invalid address ?

It's traditionally been this way. I just implemented what the comments in
sys/sys/map.h said.

There is no particular need to implement it this way. The unused slots in
the map could easily be indicated by some other number, e.g. -1.
ws@TooLs.DE     (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) 	+49-228-985800