Subject: Re: sysctl "kern" depth
To: None <tech-kern@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Niklas Hallqvist <>
List: tech-kern
Date: 08/24/1995 10:32:01
I wrote:
> Is it a design decision that all "kern" sysctl-entities should be
> terminals?  I'm in the process of implementing a syscallname sysctl,
> which I thought would be found using kern.syscall.1 etc.  But then I
> noted the terminal-test of "kern" entities, so I wonder if I should
> invent a new toplevel class, or if I should go ahead and allow the
> "kern" hierarchy to get deeper.

Oops didn't check the condition, just read the comment!  Sorry for
asking...  I now know what to do :-)


Niklas Hallqvist	Phone: +46-(0)31-40 75 00
Applitron Datasystem	Fax:   +46-(0)31-83 39 50
Molndalsvagen 95	Email:
S-412 63  GOTEBORG	WWW:   Here