Subject: Re: PCM8 vs. PCM16/LINEAR?
To: Rob Healey <email@example.com>
From: John Brezak <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/07/1995 08:55:30
> > True. But Sun really didn't get things right. They work ok for the limited
> > audio capabilities of their workstations, but the PC audio cards today
> > are way beyond that. In the NetBSD mixer design, there was a alot of though
> > put in for flexability and capability for compat. I think it has both. I
> > looked at many mixers, and thought that the Windows one really had the
> > most flexability. The Sun one, well it was for a Sun.
> Which Sun? The current model Sun's like the 4 and the 5 have much
> more capable sound system than the SS1/SS2 type systems.
> The audio interface in Solaris has been extended to handle the
> additional capabilitys; i.e. stereo CD+ sound record/playback and
> internal snarf from the CDROM on the 4/5's.
> Interested partys may want to look at the current Solaris 2.4 interface
> rather than some old ratty StunOS 4.x one build for anciant SS? series
I didn't intend for this to turn into Sun vs... so please direct those sorts
of replies directly to me and leave tech-kern alone - thanx.
Other capabilities (to name only a few) are -
- Greater than 2 channels of sound
- DSP access
Many PC cards can do these things
John Brezak Internet: email@example.com
Hewlett Packard/Apollo Phone: (508) 436-4915
300 Apollo Drive Fax: (508) 436-5140
Chelmsford, Massachusetts, USA