Subject: Re: tailq...
To: None <darrenr@vitruvius.arbld.unimelb.edu.au>
From: Charles M. Hannum <mycroft@ai.mit.edu>
List: tech-kern
Date: 07/01/1995 21:05:50
   is it safe to say that if most of the kernel is going to tailq's, that
   those of us who aspire to adding bits to netbsd should be using tailq
   too (or should start) ?

Where applicable, it is preferrable to use the macros in sys/queue.h.
Note that TAILQ_*() is not always the right choice, though.