Subject: Re: IP fragment circular lists.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/14/1995 15:03:38
> My concern is that if fragments arrive out of order and/or overlap
> it won't defragment them correctly.
> The (what seems to me to be) a significant problem is that if the
> first fragment queued isn't the first fragment and nothing can ever
> be inserted in front of the first fragment received (without deque'ing
> the queue and reque'ing it).
What makes you think that there is a problem with inserting a fragment
before the first one already in the queue? Should work perfectly well, as
far as I can see. The only somewhat tricky part is the overlaying of
ipq_next, ipq_rev and ipf_next, ipf_prev resp.
If you have any additional questions, feel free to ask.
ws@TooLs.DE (Wolfgang Solfrank, TooLs GmbH) +49-228-985800