Subject: Re: sbrk() semantics ....
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@kuma.web.net>
List: tech-kern
Date: 03/10/1995 14:06:27 
[ On Fri, March 10, 1995 at 12:07:03 (-0500), Chris G. Demetriou wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: sbrk() semantics .... 
>
> They could go away, and are only used for historical compatibility.

Maybe it could more explicitly state that the brk() & sbrk() interfaces
are "deprecated"?  (If indeed they are, and are not mentioned in
standards like P1003.1.)

-- 
						Greg A. Woods

+1 416 443-1734			VE3TCP		robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; UniForum Canada <woods@uniforum.ca>