Subject: Re: sbrk() semantics ....
To: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU>
From: Greg A. Woods <email@example.com>
Date: 03/10/1995 14:06:27
[ On Fri, March 10, 1995 at 12:07:03 (-0500), Chris G. Demetriou wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: sbrk() semantics ....
> They could go away, and are only used for historical compatibility.
Maybe it could more explicitly state that the brk() & sbrk() interfaces
are "deprecated"? (If indeed they are, and are not mentioned in
standards like P1003.1.)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP robohack!woods
Planix, Inc. <firstname.lastname@example.org>; UniForum Canada <email@example.com>