Subject: Re: type inconsistencies
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Chris G Demetriou <Chris_G_Demetriou@LAGAVULIN.PDL.CS.CMU.EDU>
Date: 03/09/1995 15:20:55
> POSIX 1003.1 doesn't define any of these, and if it did, I *strongly*
> suspect it would have used size_t in the first place. Right now,
> we're not even consistent; mmap(2) uses size_t, but the rest of them
> use int.
1003.1B ("REAL TIME!") does.
if nobody has beaten me to it, i'll look it up when i get a chance,
when i get in to work.