Subject: Re: makefs -t cd9660 lacks
To: None <email@example.com>
From: David Young <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/25/2007 19:59:14
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 09:57:49PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> - should we try to convert other ports from etc/ iso-image to distrib/
> iso_image ? The hard part here will be to test the resulting images for
> boot. Some architectures (e.g. macppc) may require some code to makefs.
I am developing a plan to add features to the cd9660 target of makefs
that macppc/mac68k need. It will make a good GSoC project.
Hubert and others have pointed out to me that makefs is missing the
"graft points" function of mkisofs. It is probably easy to fix. In the
meantime, a workaround is to either use symbolic links or to waste disk
space on a "staging" directory.
BTW, I do not believe Joliet extensions ("long" UTF-8 pathnames for
Windows) are necessary for any of our bootable CD-ROMs. Am I wrong?
I ask because makefs does not have the feature, but in my mind I assign
it very low priority.
David Young OJC Technologies
email@example.com Urbana, IL * (217) 278-3933