On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 03:47:32PM +0100, Hubert Feyrer wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > My question was: should we either remove save_X or replace it with something
> > working? I'm all for the latter.
> 
> If the latter, I'd prefer something that doesn't fail on the second
> upgrade (if the user forgets to remove X.old). But I really haven't
> touched the X binary in a long time, maybe it's really superfluous.

In theory, it is impossible to escape [1] from sysinst with X.old
still existing.  It is either put back or deleted.

	David

[1] ok kill -9 will leave it behind...

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk