Subject: Re: Criteria for TINY install media
To: James Chacon <email@example.com>
From: David Brownlee <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/07/2003 10:06:33
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, James Chacon wrote:
> Well it mainly means that either TINY should be split out from including
> anything in the normal builds or the "standard" list really is pruned down
> to just the essentials.
> TINY is kind of a 1 off for x86.
Though the same constraints apply to other ports, where less
memory is a more common occurence.
David/absolute -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --