Subject: Re: sysinst requires ping return from gateway
To: None <email@example.com>
From: James Chacon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/29/2001 02:19:02
This is getting way too complicated.
Ping it, if it doesn't return note it and offer a "continue or go back"
Same way with the whole pinging of DNS servers (which may have come out
already but was just as braindead at times).
>On 710176592 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
>"Cannella, Michael (ISS Southfield)" wrote:
>>But, my local gateway is outside my control and drops traffic aimed directly
>>at it (e.g., icmp).
>>Since sysinst requires that my local gateway be pingable--and quits the
>>install if it isn't--I can't install, _even though I have both internet
>>connectivity and DNS resolution._
>>So I guess this is a suggestion that in a coming version, the sysinst make
>>some concession to folks in this situation.
>> - If the gateway doesn't return pings, notify the user and explain "it is
>>increasingly common that firewalled gateways do not respond to echo
>>requests, or other traffic addressed directly to the gateway. If you know or
>>suspect that your gateway behaves this way (or are otherwise sure you have
>>internet connectivity and DNS resolution), choose 'Continue'. Otherwise you
>>can choose to reconfigure your network settings or abort the installation
>Or we could ping the gateway, and then check the arp tables to see if we
>got it. That is enough of a proof that it exists... ;-)
> == Roland Dowdeswell http://www.Imrryr.ORG/~elric/ ==
> == The Unofficial NetBSD Web Pages http://www.Imrryr.ORG/NetBSD/ ==
> == The NetBSD Project http://www.NetBSD.ORG/ ==
> == Ponte, Inc. http://www.ponte.com/ ==