Subject: Re: Something to shoot for someday...
To: Ross Harvey <email@example.com>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/01/1999 23:18:26
Ross Harvey <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Considering that the current sysinst is doomed...
> > Yes, and we're all gonna die!!!
> > The question is _when_. 8-)
> Since a replacement for sysinst has not even been STARTED yet, AFAIK, and
> since many improvements could be carried over should a new one magically
> appear, I see no reason to stop work on the version we are shipping with
> each release.
Yes, that was exactly my point. 8-)
> And if a rewrite actually gets started, it's at first just a one-person
> job. There is no point in stopping work cooperative, project-wide work on
> the old one ... raising the passing grade for hypothetical, new sysinst
> vaporware is a good thing, not a bad thing.
Yup, exactly. It also gives ups a chance to further explore what
features/improvements are desirable in any installer.
The worst that happens is we learn something. Given the current state
of sysinst, i'd say we've got a lot to learn. 8-)
Chris Demetriou - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.