Subject: Re: Something to shoot for someday...
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Chris G. Demetriou <email@example.com>
Date: 07/01/1999 01:46:51
Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> writes:
> It'd be possible to add it back, but all the `backend' code which also
> takes UI action (e.g., running a program in a subwindow so that users
> can see any output or error messages) would have to be re-written to
> go via a UI-mechanism layer. Right now, the backend code has inline
> curses calls all through it. Is it worth fixing that?
Personally, I don't think it's worth going there until:
* a UI toolkit that's adaptable to both X and curses is
* general conversion of the rest of the interface (e.g. menu
and message display) is started.
Really, I think the menu and message display issues are much harder
and much less localized than the program-running code. 8-)
Note that I think that much of the work that I just outlined as
"things I think need to be done" will probably make transitioning to
a toolkit a bit easier. Really, the msg/menu APIs need to be cleaned
up a lot (and a need a few more features), and that whole list falls
out of that and the desire to make the code more maintainable.
Chris Demetriou - firstname.lastname@example.org - http://www.netbsd.org/People/Pages/cgd.html
Disclaimer: Not speaking for NetBSD, just expressing my own opinion.