Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
To: Zafer Aydogan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Marcin Jessa <email@example.com>
Date: 10/26/2005 12:58:12
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:36:44 +0200 (MEST)
"Zafer Aydogan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > --- Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: Timo Schoeler <email@example.com>
> > An: "Zafer Aydogan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Kopie: email@example.com, tech-embed@NetBSD.org, firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> > Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:23:49 +0200
> > >=20
> > > That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want
> > > to run NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy
> > > and under
> > heavy
> > > development.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > (besides the massive x-posting: am i missing <irony> </irony> tags?
> > aren't there
> > several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)
> Name one.
And please stop replying to this thread, you're not bringing any
reasonable information to it and all you do is trolling.
> There is recently no embedded hardware running NetBSD. Also in the
> past, there were barely any Product running NetBSD OS.
> > hm, i think then it's time to do it again? ;)
> Nice approach.