Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
To: Timo Schoeler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Zafer Aydogan <email@example.com>
Date: 10/26/2005 14:36:44
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Von: Timo Schoeler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> An: "Zafer Aydogan" <email@example.com>
> Kopie: firstname.lastname@example.org, tech-embed@NetBSD.org, email@example.com
> Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:23:49 +0200
> > That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want to run
> > NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy and under
> > development.
> (besides the massive x-posting: am i missing <irony> </irony> tags? aren't
> several commercial products using NetBSD or based upon it?)
There is recently no embedded hardware running NetBSD. Also in the past,
there were barely any Product running NetBSD OS.
> hm, i think then it's time to do it again? ;)