Subject: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Ian Zagorskih <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/26/2005 19:23:10
> > --- Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht ---
> > Von: "Stefan 'Kaishakunin' Schumacher" <email@example.com>
> > An: Marcin Jessa <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Kopie: NetBSD-embed <tech-embed@NetBSD.org>, NetBSD-net
> > <email@example.com>
> > Betreff: Re: Real Time O.S vs 'conventional' one.
> > Datum: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:17:52 +0200
> > Also sprach Marcin Jessa (firstname.lastname@example.org)
> > > I have embedded boards which I want to use as acess points for WLAN
> > > infrastructure.
> > > The choice is between NetBSD and Real Time Linux.
> > > What I am wondering about is if there is any advantage using real
> > > time O.S on wireless enviroment.
> That depends. If you want to run a business, then you don't want to run
> NetBSD at all, at least not right now, because it is buggy and under heavy
> development. If it is just for your home environment, you can give it a
We have been running our business heavily using NetBSD in embedded designs =
several years now and it serves us very well. Just my 2 cents..