Subject: Re: Via Samuel 2 / mini-ITX
To: James Mansion <>
From: Martin Husemann <>
List: tech-embed
Date: 10/13/2005 10:58:26
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:53:44PM +0100, James Mansion wrote:
> I
> thought unionfs was originally a BSD-ism, but that doesn't mean NetBSD has
> an implementation.

See mount(8) and look for "union", or look at mount_union(8).

> It might be called cloop?

Ah, compressed vnd's - see vnd(4) [only in 3.0 or -current]