Subject: Re: openssl 0.9.7 in NetBSD?
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
List: tech-crypto
Date: 06/29/2003 08:47:55
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


itojun@iijlab.net writes:

>>>	here are differences in terms of library symbols.  it seems that the
>>>	biggest difference is rename of des_xx functions to DES_xx functions.
>>>	it has a large impact on existing codebase, i guess.  we may need to
>>>	provide aliases or whatever.
>>	DES/des functions are not renames, but API changes.  see des_old.h
>>	shipped with 0.9.7b.  we may need to supply old functions to users,
>>	for backward compat's sake (or a shlib major bump).
>
> 	a split of libdes and libcrypto is clearly needed.
> 	which functions have to be provided by libdes?

but libdes and libcrypto will then provide the same symbols. There are
applications that link agaist both libcrypto and libdes.

Love

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)
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=HW2o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--