Subject: Re: Releases
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael Richardson <email@example.com>
Date: 09/11/1999 19:38:17
>>>>> "Perry" == Perry E Metzger <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Perry> We have an interesting problem for future releases.
Perry> For 1.4, we had domestic US cryptography only. Because of this, we
Perry> could release a "secr" set built out of those sources for
Perry> U.S. consumption and be done with it. If you were in the U.S. and
Perry> Canada you could choose to fetch secr and if you were outside you
Perry> couldn't and just ran without.
Perry> Now, however, we have both U.S. and non-US crypto. We have to make
Perry> policy decisions about what gets put into the official 1.5 release,
Perry> and where it gets built. This is a can of worms. Anyone care to
Perry> brainstorm on the subject?
Would you say that the "secr" set was really part of the official release
After all, it was not unencumbered the way that the rest of code
is. Although it didn't not have licensing issues, it still could not be
redistributed, sold, modified, etc. as freely as, say, syssrc.
My preference is to have "isecr" to replace "secr", and encourage US people
to import it. I don't think we can given up "secr" yet, though, but that
isn't my place to comment upon.
] Out and about in Ottawa. hmmm... beer. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] email@example.com http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [