On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:29:40AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> why do you bother to keep the broken one?
> given the purely advisory nature of the syscall,
> i don't think it's worth to do.

Because that is how I understood core, after you pointed out that the old
version actually worked on i386 - I guess there is some misunderstanding
somewhere. I have no problem making the old syscal just UNIMPL.

Martin