> > Can you try to see if IOCPARM_MAX can be fixed?  If not, disable rump
> > for sparc and I'll look at in a couple of days.  I *really* don't have
> > time now.
> 
> After a brief chat with pooka, I've committed a build fix for
> this by declaring "int nbpg" somewhere semi-appropriate if we're
> building for something which defines __sparc__.

Heh, that was pretty much the exact fix I was thinking of doing.