Antti Kantee wrote:

> ic.  I'd like to fix this another way and get rid of LFS_KERNEL_RFW
> completely since seems it's runtime-controlled.  Or nuke the code if it
> doesn't work.  YASI (Yet Another Stupid Ifdef)

I think it raises some interesting questions, some may have already been
answered --

How does rump interact (if at all) with kernel options?

How does rump interact with sysctl-controlled features in kernel code?
do the linksets Just Work?

-e.