On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 01:57:30PM +0200, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 10:52:16AM +0000, Andrew Doran wrote:
> > 
> > Log Message:
> > kcont was removed.
> > 
> 
> Uh. Huh? where was THIS discussed? Not that I have a say,
> but I'd like to gain an insight from the discussion.
> Is this replaced by some thread-voodoo [workqueue??] ?

It is literally completely unused. While the functionality could be
useful, the interface is IMO a full mess. Many cases are equally served
by workqueues or generic soft interrupts.

Joerg