On 25/06/2007, at 20:20, Greg A. Woods wrote:

> [...]
> As an aside, these change-set based source code management tools, such
> as Mercurial in particular, would greatly facilitate third-party
> developers such as myself too.  We could much more easily provide  
> small
> change sets with only inter-related changes even when our local trees
> contain many un-related changes to the same files.

Indeed, and I think we all would like to switch away from CVS.   
However, NetBSD is a very large source tree, and most of the current  
DVCS tools (and centralized ones too!) do not scale well to handle  
it.  If someone experimented with the NetBSD tree in multiple  
systems, did some benchmarks, etc. etc. we'd draw some conclusions  
and make the switch, I guess ;-)

-- 
Julio M. Merino Vidal <jmmv84@gmail.com>