On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 14:50:33 +0900 (JST)
yamt@mwd.biglobe.ne.jp (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:

> an alternative is making the function return a set of values
> rather than using cpu_info.  i'm not sure if it's worth to do, given
> no users, tho.

I don't think we need it (at least for now), because in the write op
ci_msr_rvalue is assigned and we can see the value in msr_cpu_broadcast.

(I was thinking on it too, thanks).

-- 
http://plog.xtrarom.org/
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish