On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 05:27:02PM -0800, John Nemeth wrote:
> } So it's probably a good solution. But I won't be able to look at this before
> } 2 weeks; if someone else can test and commit please do !
> 
>      I've tested the following combinations:
> 
> fdc* at acpi?
> fdc0 at isa?
> - results in fdc1 at acpi
> 
> # fdc0 at acpi?
> fdc0 at isa?
> - results in fdc0 at isa
> 
> fdc0 at acpi?
> fdc0 at isa?
> - results in fdc0 at acpi
> 
> fdc0 at acpi?
> fdc* at acpi?
> fdc0 at isa?
> - results in fdc0 at acpi
> 
> fdc* at acpi?
> fdc* at isa?
> - results in fdc0 at acpi
> 
> Which one would be the best option?

IHMO:
fdc0 at acpi?
fdc* at acpi?
fdc0 at isa?

"fdc* at isa?" can have a problem because we have fdc0 at 0x3f0 and we can have
fdc1 at 0x370. If they get swapped we have the same issue as with fdc1 at
acpi (I don't think we'll ever have fdc1 at acpi ...)

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--