Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/i386/conf
To: Izumi Tsutsui <email@example.com>
From: Valeriy E. Ushakov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 11/27/2006 21:38:24
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 01:50:18 +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > tls@ added -mfoo to COPTS (e.g. 1.794 of GENERIC). The fix is to add
> > -mfoo to CPUFLAGS instead (we have plenty of configs that do that),
> > not adding -O2 to COPTS in the config.
> Well, I asked tls to do so but got no response.
> There was also some opinion to object to use CPUFLAGS
> in kernel config. That's what I called "no conclusion."
Hmm, was there (I don't think I followed the discussion)? We have
quite a number of configs (about 40) for arm, ppc, and mips ports that
use CPUFLAGS precisely for supplying appropriate -mfoo options as the
port (or the specific machine that the config targets) is known to
have given cpu variant.
CPUFLAGS was introduced by Jason precisely for this purpose.
firstname.lastname@example.org | Zu Grunde kommen
http://snark.ptc.spbu.ru/~uwe/ | Ist zu Grunde gehen