On Nov 12, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:

> thorpej@shagadelic.org wrote:
>
>> Should we have a generic ETHER_ALIGN macro?
>
> I think so.
> (though rtl8169.c should have some flag which indicates RTL8168 quirk,
>  which can't xfer RX packets into unaligned buffers)

So, we'd have a RE_ETHER_ALIGN(sc) macro that wraps it?  Sounds good.

> Maybe should we also have ETHER_PAD_LEN?

What would ETHER_PAD_LEN's semantics and usage?

-- thorpej