Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/x86/x86
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Christoph Badura <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/17/2006 00:01:47
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:06:23PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> > There is another use of the fields: fsck uses them to compute the
> > prototype
> > superblock. But it does not seem to break anything when you get rid
> > of them.
How did you test this? calcsb() is only ever called when the primary
superblock is trashed. I.e. it is used to automatically find the
> In fact, how would fsck handle this if checking the file system on any
> number of disk partition formats that do NOT support these fields?
Is this a trick question? Do you really think anyone at Berkeley has
thought about this?