--4C6bbPZ6c/S1npyF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 01:03:26PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
>=20
> cube@cubidou.net said:
> > But what should be tested?  Support for the compat syscall in the
> > timecounters branch?=20
>=20
> This change is independant of the timecounters branch, so
> the tests could be done right now.

Yeah, right, independent.  Looks more to me as "committed ahead of hte
merge".

> There would be 2 cases: old (eg 3.0) userland with COMPAT_30,
> using the "short" struct ntptimeval, and new userland using
> the "long" struct ntptimeval.
> (assuming that COMPAT_30 on a 64-bit system affects both
> native and 32bit support, which has been the case afaict)

The thing is, netbsd32_get_ntptime is changed in the timecounters
branch.  I don't know how far we are from the merge, but is there a
point of doing any change now that will have to be undone in the branch
and re-done in some way for when the branch is ready to merge?

I wish good luck to Frank and Simon for the next sync with HEAD, anyway.

--=20
Quentin Garnier - cube@cubidou.net - cube@NetBSD.org
"When I find the controls, I'll go where I like, I'll know where I want
to be, but maybe for now I'll stay right here on a silent sea."
KT Tunstall, Silent Sea, Eye to the Telescope, 2004.

--4C6bbPZ6c/S1npyF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (NetBSD)

iQEVAwUBRHrlidgoQloHrPnoAQIFqwf/ZNKV09n3rypor48nHU5bvAU4rizs0Kdc
/njcgVVSCE7auHWnXlVVoHhhh0mLdEh4IxJY+LMYdSuw5j6YEspaN4lx2vX3rUFw
HCJx2/SBolaRCJLernCwvrcdcH/q+V8ot1m4OIF9srIuSdqy9YzZV1QtBQvhtOl8
6XHHGvokBbdtYBIG+Pl+20X8MsxkQb6h6UslVo8JheLqWFzTq1fRxdjd6kDkq/P7
IHp4A9dpBFjGFnDjnBMHYDjX3GD3YLn6bxrt3hrCdiurKYvlQJCJ/eK/W27A2s1C
De2uXiEx7mr/Bp6zqbJJyfnuW+60bYHc261wfPGSigEVo7WsLyZMaA==
=bIZB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--4C6bbPZ6c/S1npyF--