enami tsugutomo <enami@but-b.or.jp> writes:

>> It was intended to switch the if-else-if-else-if-else clause to a
>> switch statement. The iospace case is a bit different.
>
> ?  I guess you don't get my point.

It doesn't mean it's all my fault...

> What I asked is the reason you left the break statement existed in the
> if statement when converting it to switch statement.

Why shouldn't I ? It's an error condition and it should get off the
switch statement.

-- 
  Rui Paulo			<rpaulo@{NetBSD{,-PT}.org,fnop.net}>