Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/pci
To: Jared D. McNeill <email@example.com>
From: Garrett D'Amore <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/23/2006 13:38:13
Jared D. McNeill wrote:
> On 23-Feb-06, at 3:47 PM, Tim Rightnour wrote:
>> On 23-Feb-2006 Jason Thorpe wrote:
>>> What's wrong with autri specifically matching only the device class
>>> it cares about?
>> I'm ok with that.. but does anyone know for sure what class of device
>> the autri
>> claims to be? I don't have one.. so I'm not sure..
>> If someone can tell me the class, my plan would be to change autri to
>> return 1
>> if found, 2 if found and class is correct, and have if_pcn return 2
>> if it
>> finds one and the class is network.
> This might not be a big deal, but I'd just like to point out that in
> the event that someone boots a kernel that includes the autri driver
> but not the pcn driver, with this solution the autri driver will still
> try to attach.
> I wouldn't expect this to cause any major problems.. just thought I'd
> mention it incase someone thinks otherwise.
Yes, and it seems a lot cleaner to just include the check for the class
code and *reject* the attachment for a mismatched device than to use the
ordering logic. Just my 2c.
Garrett D'Amore, Principal Software Engineer
Tadpole Computer / Computing Technologies Division,
General Dynamics C4 Systems
Phone: 951 325-2134 Fax: 951 325-2191