Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/include
To: None <elad@NetBSD.org>
From: YAMAMOTO Takashi <email@example.com>
Date: 02/18/2006 22:02:44
> well i was thinking that since we provide a way to check a password
> against a policy, it might be desired to use this api exclusively
> when doing so, making the code look like:
> if (policy_is_not_loaded)
> load alternate policy;
> check with pw_policy_test();
> ...which might prove to be easier to do in some cases (i think).
does really "alternate policy" need to be application specific?
> would it be possible to avoid memory allocation and just typedef
> the struct? (say, pw_policy_t)
IMO, hiding implementation details is a good enough reason to use malloc.