Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi
To: Jason Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/13/2005 11:13:06
On Dec 13, 7:42am, email@example.com (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/acpi
| On Dec 12, 2005, at 4:59 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > You mean MI code? MachDep is just that. In this particular case,
| > not every
| > machine has ACPI. To compare, how about a machine that has
| > turbochannel and
| > needs a sysctl? I think that the precedence is hw.*, right?
| Where do other devices get inserted into the tree?
| Anyway, I think hw.acpi.root might be OK. Would allow for other ACPI
| nodes to be added later.
Yes, hw.acpi.root sounds ok for now.