Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/pci
To: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
Date: 12/06/2005 12:41:20
On Dec 6, 8:51am, firstname.lastname@example.org (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/pci
| On Dec 6, 2005, at 8:17 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > On Dec 6, 7:44am, email@example.com (Jason Thorpe) wrote:
| > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/dev/pci
| > | I cleaned this up a little, but we really shouldn't be going this in
| > | the first place.
| > Any better solutions? This looked iffy to me, but I could not think
| > of a
| > better way of doing it.
| lmc already matches with priority 100. That will always beat de (1)
| and tlp (10).
| If you install an LMC card and don't include the lmc driver, then de
| or tlp could match, but what is the harm in that? It probably
| wouldn't do anything because it would fail to find Ethernet media (no
| ISV SROM, so it would fall into the "sorry, don't know how to handle
| your card" case in tlp, at least).
So I can just remove the code, right?