Hi Lennart,

I meant that there were two complete sets of patches for
dev/usb/{ohci.c,ohcivar.h} in the PR, the second from
"Wed, 09 Nov 2005 18:31:04".  Do you mean you're happy
for me back out the first set of changes you've already
committed and for me to apply the second set?  I don't
have a "normal" OHCI I can test on...

Cheers,
Simon.
--
Simon Burge                                   <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
NetBSD Development, Support and Service:   http://www.wasabisystems.com/

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:34:27AM +0100, Lennart Augustsson wrote:

> Simon,
> 
> I applied the USB related changes because they looked
> good to me.  I think the other half is good too, but
> I can't test it.  Feel free to apply the other half
> if you think it looks good.
> 
> 	-- Lennart
> 
> Simon Burge wrote:
> >Hi Lennart,
> >
> >Lennart Augustsson wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Module Name:	src
> >>Committed By:	augustss
> >>Date:		Mon Nov 14 13:40:24 UTC 2005
> >>
> >>Modified Files:
> >>
> >>	src/sys/dev/usb: ohci.c ohcivar.h
> >>
> >>Log Message:
> >>
> >>Make it possible to decide endianess dynamically.  From port-evbmips/31912
> >>by "Garrett D'Amore" <garrett_damore@tadpole.com>.
> >
> >
> >There were two sets of patches in the PR, and unfortunately you've
> >committed the first set which don't work in little-endian mode on the
> >Alchemy CPU.  I've confirmed that the latter set of patches work fine on
> >both big- and little-endian Alchemy CPUs but I don't have any other sort
> >of machine here with OHCI, just UHCI.  The second set of patches remove
> >the OHCI_DYNAMIC_ENDIAN conditional, so they should be double checked to
> >work on non-Alchemy OHCI controllers too.
> >
> >Is the second set of patches in that PR ok to apply, or can you commit
> >them if you're happy with them?
> >
> >Simon.
> >--
> >Simon Burge                            <simonb@wasabisystems.com>
> >NetBSD Support and Service:         http://www.wasabisystems.com/