In article <20040608062231.GA12345@vaasje.org>
   fvdl@netbsd.org wrote:
   
   > I'd agree wih that. install-tiny will overflow again soon enough, so
   > if gzip isn't really needed, just leave it off, since you'll have to
   > remove it again anyway.
   
   Maybe it depends how many people require bzip2 or compress support on it?

maybe we need a utils/x_gzip_plus_compress_and_bzip2 ? :-)
   
   BTW, are there any reason why ramdisk-tiny and install-tiny have
   KERNFS support? Isn't ditrib/utils/x_dmesg enough?

depends which is smaller.