Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/amiga/stand/misc
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: James Chacon <jmc@NetBSD.org>
List: source-changes
Date: 06/05/2004 21:11:07
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 02:28:58AM +1000, matthew green wrote:
> 
>    Michael L. Hitch wrote:
>    > 
>    > Module Name:	src
>    > Committed By:	mhitch
>    > Date:		Tue Jun  1 02:25:09 UTC 2004
>    > 
>    > Added Files:
>    > 	src/sys/arch/amiga/stand/misc: Makefile device-streams.tar.gz.uue
>    > 	    loadbsd-2.14.gz.uue loadbsd-2.14.uue loadbsd-2.16.gz.uue
>    > 	    loadbsd.gz.uue loadbsd.uue rdbinfo.gz.uue rdbinfo.uue
>    > 	    runbootblock.README runbootblock.uue xstreamtodev.gz.uue
>    > 	    xstreamtodev.uue
>    > 
>    > Log Message:
>    > Add AmigaDOS tools for the amiga, which end up in the "installation/misc"
>    > directory of the release tree.
>    
>    These should go under src/distrib, I think.
> 
> i don't think so.  their sources are in sys/arch/amiga/stand and
> like all the other platforms that have bootblocks built on other
> systems, they're checked into sys not distrib.
> 

Actually if they're just used/decoded/etc under a make release (ala sets)
I disagree then. Bootblocks aren't the same thing as uuencoded binaries you
can only use on the native box to bootstrap an install. Those are clearly
distrib tools.

James