Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
To: Jaromir Dolecek <jdolecek@NetBSD.org>
From: Sean Davis <email@example.com>
Date: 11/04/2003 12:03:55
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:56:49PM +0100, Jaromir Dolecek wrote:
> Sean Davis wrote:
> > > Log Message:
> > > Remove p_nras from struct proc - use LIST_EMPTY(&p->p_raslist) instead.
> > > Remove p_raslock and rename p_lwplock p_lock (one lock is enough).
> > > (pad fields left in struct proc to avoid kernel bump)
> > Isn't it better to have to bump the kernel version than to waste memory
> > (admittedly a tiny amount) on unused (and not likely to ever be used) fields
> > in the structure?
> It will be removed on next structure change. There is at least
> one such change going in soon, removing fields no longer necessary
> after pending reaper kernel thread removal.
Ah. Just how 'pending' is the reaper thread removal? I'm not being
impatient, just curious :)
> > -Sean
> > --
> > /~\ The ASCII
> > \ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
> > X Against HTML aka dive
> > / \ Email!
> -- End of PGP section, PGP failed!
(OT) is this a problem with pgp(gpg?) on your end? I send/receive gpg'd
messages all the time, and my key is on the keyservers..
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
X Against HTML aka dive
/ \ Email!