Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/sys
To: David Laight <>
From: Sean Davis <>
List: source-changes
Date: 11/04/2003 11:50:53
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:19:52PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
> Module Name:	src
> Committed By:	dsl
> Date:		Tue Nov  4 16:19:52 UTC 2003
> Modified Files:
> 	src/sys/sys: proc.h
> Log Message:
> Remove p_nras from struct proc - use LIST_EMPTY(&p->p_raslist) instead.
> Remove p_raslock and rename p_lwplock p_lock (one lock is enough).
> (pad fields left in struct proc to avoid kernel bump)

Isn't it better to have to bump the kernel version than to waste memory
(admittedly a tiny amount) on unused (and not likely to ever be used) fields
in the structure?


/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign                   Sean Davis
 X  Against HTML                       aka dive
/ \ Email!

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)