--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 04:19:52PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>=20
> Module Name:	src
> Committed By:	dsl
> Date:		Tue Nov  4 16:19:52 UTC 2003
>=20
> Modified Files:
> 	src/sys/sys: proc.h
>=20
> Log Message:
> Remove p_nras from struct proc - use LIST_EMPTY(&p->p_raslist) instead.
> Remove p_raslock and rename p_lwplock p_lock (one lock is enough).
> (pad fields left in struct proc to avoid kernel bump)

Isn't it better to have to bump the kernel version than to waste memory
(admittedly a tiny amount) on unused (and not likely to ever be used) fields
in the structure?

-Sean

--
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign                   Sean Davis
 X  Against HTML                       aka dive
/ \ Email!

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE/p9jtcMEZWGhfx9kRAsUJAJ9Z5AzJhGAO4f++oipAB7OVWc5/twCgl7gF
SAIU8z9GJj3TeEv0WlBXeJo=
=At2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--