Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/alpha
To: Christos Zoulas <email@example.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/19/2003 09:17:47
On Friday, September 19, 2003, at 07:13 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Sep 19, 10:08am, email@example.com ("Perry E. Metzger") wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/sys/arch/alpha
> If there are technical reasons for not putting PT_STEP in the
> kernel, another way would be to put it in the libc ptrace() stub, so
> that it is available for other applications.
> Jason, what do you think about that?
I think it's wrong. I think that if breakpoint-based stepping is going
to happen, then the debugger should KNOW that, and have explicit
control over it.
For example, if the kernel writes over an instruction word, and the
debugger doesn't know about it, you have no way to properly disassemble
the function you're stepping through. On the other hand, if the
debugger writes over an instruction word, it has a record of it, and
can compensate during disassembly.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>