Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man5
To: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
From: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/14/2003 13:32:50
On Sep 14, 2:48pm, wiz@NetBSD.org (Thomas Klausner) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man5
Please go ahead. Remember to fix the cross references though.
| On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:28:39PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
| > On Sep 10, 1:17pm, email@example.com ("Perry E. Metzger") wrote:
| > -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man5
| > | firstname.lastname@example.org (Christos Zoulas) writes:
| > | > Is ucontext a file format? We can move it, but then we should move both.
| > |
| > | Yah, we probably should move both.
| > |
| > | Maybe we want to allow section 2 overview pages in addition to system
| > | calls.
| > |
| > | Perry
| > -- End of excerpt from "Perry E. Metzger"
| > Well, this needs a bit more thought... What does /etc/wizd have to say?
| I have no problem with man pages for structures or overview man pages.
| "man 2 intro" says even now:
| This section provides an overview of the system calls, their error re-
| turns, and other common definitions and concepts.
| Solaris seems to have a ucontext(3), too.
| So I'm for moving it.
-- End of excerpt from Thomas Klausner