Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man5
To: Christos Zoulas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz@NetBSD.org>
Date: 09/14/2003 14:48:15
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:28:39PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> On Sep 10, 1:17pm, email@example.com ("Perry E. Metzger") wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: CVS commit: src/share/man/man5
> | firstname.lastname@example.org (Christos Zoulas) writes:
> | > Is ucontext a file format? We can move it, but then we should move both.
> | Yah, we probably should move both.
> | Maybe we want to allow section 2 overview pages in addition to system
> | calls.
> | Perry
> -- End of excerpt from "Perry E. Metzger"
> Well, this needs a bit more thought... What does /etc/wizd have to say?
I have no problem with man pages for structures or overview man pages.
"man 2 intro" says even now:
This section provides an overview of the system calls, their error re-
turns, and other common definitions and concepts.
Solaris seems to have a ucontext(3), too.
So I'm for moving it.