Subject: re: PF_KEY socket buffer size issue
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <email@example.com>
From: matthew green <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/11/2003 09:18:37
> > no. see sbin/setkey/setkey.c for what it does. it uses /kern if
> > available, and uses PF_KEY socket if not.
> I would have thought that the routing socket would suffer from the same
> Why can't this be fixed the same way as for the routing socket?
routing scket operation case was fixed by using sysctl(NET_RT_DUMP).
why can't PF_KEY use a sysctl then?