Subject: re: PF_KEY socket buffer size issue
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <>
From: matthew green <>
List: source-changes
Date: 09/11/2003 09:18:37
   > > 	no.  see sbin/setkey/setkey.c for what it does.  it uses /kern if
   > > 	available, and uses PF_KEY socket if not.
   > I would have thought that the routing socket would suffer from the same
   > problem.
   > Why can't this be fixed the same way as for the routing socket?
   	routing scket operation case was fixed by using sysctl(NET_RT_DUMP).

why can't PF_KEY use a sysctl then?