On Monday, September 8, 2003, at 07:14  AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:

> In article <D6A233F6-E205-11D7-B9AD-000A957650EC@wasabisystems.com>,
> Jason Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com> wrote:
>>
>> Have we ever done this before when a new kernel was required for a new
>> libc?  Are we going to do this every time a new arch gets the siginfo
>> changes?
>
> 1. no (at least I don't remember one), I just wanted to be extra 
> careful
>    this time.
> 2. absolutely not. there is no point at all bumping the number for 
> each of
>    the architectures.

Right, so my point is "why treat the case you bumped it for any 
differently?"

         -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>