Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU> writes:
> >True enough, but if you're doing a "Traditional BSD" overlapping copy
> >you use ovbcopy... not that either should be done any longer...
> 
> Exactly why I changed it to use ovbcopy().
> 
> Unless someone else wants to maintain netipsec (and opencrypto): me,
> I'd sooner keep using the compat macros for netipsec, and keep
> our code  in synch with Sam Leffler's code, thanks all the same.
> Pointless code-thrash is ... well, pointless.

It might be a good idea to encourage the FreeBSD people to do the same
thing we've done (i.e. move to the mem* functions, which among other
things are nicely inlined by gcc).

-- 
Perry E. Metzger		perry@piermont.com