On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:33:47AM -0500, John Hawkinson wrote:
  | David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org> wrote on Wed, 22 Jan 2003
  | at 10:04:38 +0000 in <Pine.NEB.4.51.0301221004070.26199@dev.6nations.co.uk>:
  | 
  | 
  | > 	Should this be optional based on -DSMALL or similar?
  | > 	(For TINY install media)
  | 
  | I am uncertain what the full set of criteria for TINY is.
  | It appeared to me that it did not overfill install media, but
  | I did not test for all architectures.
  | 
  | Pragmatically, because it is difficult to add a file to
  | "all but some" architectures, I did it this wy.
  | 
  | If it proves a problem, we could revisit it...is that the wrong
  | attitude for TINY?

If all the distrib media build (and even better, if you tested them;
I recall that you've asked for more testing of these things ;-), then
it's fine to leave your change.