David Brownlee <abs@netbsd.org> wrote on Wed, 22 Jan 2003
at 10:04:38 +0000 in <Pine.NEB.4.51.0301221004070.26199@dev.6nations.co.uk>:


> 	Should this be optional based on -DSMALL or similar?
> 	(For TINY install media)

I am uncertain what the full set of criteria for TINY is.
It appeared to me that it did not overfill install media, but
I did not test for all architectures.

Pragmatically, because it is difficult to add a file to
"all but some" architectures, I did it this wy.

If it proves a problem, we could revisit it...is that the wrong
attitude for TINY?

--jhawk