On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 07:39:11PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> I can't see any reasons to not print it. Why do you want to have SCSI2
> handled differently ?

I was just trying to cut down on the stuff printed as most devices
cause the 80-line to overflow and things like SCSI version do not
seem to be essential user information. I'd say things like that
belong in 'scsictl identify' or similar.

But due to popular request I'll put it back in for now :-)


-- 
Soren